Week 4: Done with mangrove roots!

Our lab just finished processing 160+ mangrove roots, which constitutes the largest mangrove biodiversity survey effort attempted…ever.

Can you tell how excited Rosalyn and I are to be done with roots?!

(Almost) every day for the past 3 weeks, we have been tirelessly going through mangrove roots from different mangrove forests around the archipelago and quantifying their biodiversity by carefully collecting organisms and processing every single aspect of the root – down to the water that it came in.

Here is the final root I will be doing for a long, long time:

You’re looking at a mangrove root covered in mostly bivalves and different species of sponges.

Living on and inside this root included shrimps, brittle stars, crabs, tunicates, amphipods, isopods, flatworms (and other worms), and more. It’s incredible to think that the roots of a tree can support so much marine life on its own.

Hidden within my last root were all of these brittle stars!

Challenge: find the decorator crab (Nemausa!)

Here it is! The crab covered itself in sponges for camouflage and you can sort-of see its back on the top center of the previous photo.

Some other cool organisms that were found on our roots and collected in the water:

Juvenile octopus!

Check out this Lettuce Sea Slug (Elysia crispata)! These are part of the group of organisms that exhibit Kleptoplasty, or the ability to steal chloroplasts from their food sources and use them. That makes them solar-powered sea slugs!

This guy is known as a sea hare (genus Aplysia) and was very active throughout the day! They are medium to extremely large-sized sea slugs.

To celebrate the end of processing mangrove roots, I went fishing off the dock. After writing about Rosalyn’s research on microplastics in seafood a few days ago, we are going to try and see if we can examine fish guts here from species that are generalists (not picky eaters). I haven’t been fishing for a long time and stopped after learning about overfishing…but for science, I gave it another shot. To be honest, it was quite fun, especially after I caught a snapper and was able to let it go!

After a few unsuccessful attempts, I finally caught a snapper!

Today is World Oceans Day and I’m gonna talk trash

This year’s conservation focus for World Ocean’s Day is “encouraging solutions to plastic pollution and preventing marine litter for a healthier ocean and a better future.”

I think it’s fair to say that we know our oceans are becoming plastic soups. Plastics never truly degrade – they only get broken up into smaller and smaller pieces. Every piece of plastic ever made still exists somewhere in our environment.

Here’s a quick refresher on how plastic moves from our hands to elsewhere (and everywhere):

Here in Bocas del Toro, waste management efforts are fairly poor. There is little to no recycling effort and trash gets burned or dumped into the ocean. This is not a problem of the local residents – rather, the transient flow of tourists makes it difficult to establish a precedent for recycling. In addition, waste management systems largely dictate how individuals are able to deal with trash, so even if someone wanted to responsibly get rid of their waste in town here, they might not be able to here due to structural forces much larger than them.

However, there are people in this area who are trying to raise awareness about plastic usage in Bocas. The Plastic Water Bottle Village (a place still on my to-visit list) is an “eco-residential community” of homes that are built from recycled plastic water bottles. The creator of the village, Robert Bezeau, estimates that he has collected over one million bottles over the course of a year and a half. However, local rumors indicate some skepticism about its actual feasibility. Regardless, Robert also spearheaded a Bocas recycling program in 2012. I hope to actually have a conversation with him about how to reduce everyday waste!

One of the first things I noticed when I snorkeled along mangrove roots here was the amount of trash that got caught in them. Even deeper in the mangrove forest, high tides swept whole plastic items and stuck them in-between roots. Although items like plastic bags, beer bottles, and other unidentifiable garbage may seem integrated into the ecosystem since marine organisms live on and around them, there are less conspicuous consequences that are also taking place. Even today, it didn’t take much effort (maybe 30 seconds?) for me to spot bits of garbage entangled deep within the mangrove roots and forest.

Garbage bags (and its contents) drape over the mangrove root. See if you can spot more deeper within the forest.

Industry consultant R.W. Beck estimated that only 12% of “custom” plastic bottles were recycled in 2003. While demand for plastic bottles has only decreased, recycling efforts have flatlined or decreased.

One of those consequences is that our waste into the ocean is making its way back to our dinner plates. My friend and lab mate Rosalyn actually did research on the prevalence of plastics in seafood that was marketed for human consumption.

Rosalyn studied wildlife, fish, and conservation Biology with a specialization in aquatic toxicology from the University of California, Davis. Here she is with a needlefish we found near the dock!

After collecting seafood on sale for human consumption in Makassar, Indonesia and California, it was found that anthropogenic debris was present in 28% of individual fish in Makassar, Indonesia and 25% of individual fish in California. In Indonesia, the majority of anthropogenic waste was plastic debris while in the US, the majority of anthropogenic waste was plastic and synthetic fibers. Rosalyn explained that this is probably due to the different waste management infrastructures present in both countries – in Indonesia, 30% of solid waste that is generated is not processed and directly discarded into waterways while in California, more advanced waste management systems prevent large plastic items to be discarded in the ocean, however waste water outfalls result in plastics ending up in about the same percentages for seafood intended for human consumption in both places.

This figure is from the paper Rosalyn was a part of! All credits go to the authors in Rochman et al. (2015)

Would you feed plastic to the seafood you’re eating? Sounds pretty unappetizing to me.

Check out the awesome paper she co-authored in Nature Communications here: Rochman, C. M. et al. Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci. Rep5, 14340; doi: 10.1038/srep14340 (2015).

Back in the US, I am able to freely disassociate from myself from the waste I produce. Once my waste ends up in a trash can or recycling bin, it’s out of sight and out of mind. Here, I am literally swimming in garbage most times I enter the water. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that the people in Bocas del Toro, Panama are more negligent when it comes to their wastefulness  – if anything, it just means that local impacts are more visible.

Protect marine ecosystems like they are in your backyard!

Ideally, studying the biodiversity of nearshore marine ecosystems and their means examining unaltered and untouched marine habitats and communities, but that no longer is the norm. In contrast, more and more scientists will have to account for human impact (like pollution and waste) in their research and data analyses.

We choose to bring more plastic into existence on this planet, and there’s not a lot we can do about it (currently) once it enters prolifically into our oceans and environment. Being conscientious about the consequences of convenience is a great first step, and one that can make a huge difference!

Here’s a link to 51 ways you can reduce your plastic usage, courtesy of Reef Relief: https://www.reefrelief.org/2013/01/51-ways-to-reduce-plastic-use-or-completely-eliminate-it/ Continue reading →

Shrimpy attempts at taxonomy

Today, I spent three hours identifying shrimps for fun with our expert decapod taxonomist, Paulo!

Paulo gave us a “very basic minicourse on shrimp identification in Bocas Del Toro” before we looked under the scope.

In particular, my friend Coll and I were able to get to the species level of a snapping shrimp, which make up the most distinctive sound on coral reefs and most of the ocean. The crackling and popping noises you hear underwater are due to the loud sound that they are able to make with a dominant claw, which emit a powerful wave of bubbles that can stun fish much larger than them in size.

Snapping shrimp are in the family Alpheidae and can be found worldwide. The species we identified was from one of two prominent genera, Synalpheus. In our mangrove root samples, we end up finding more Synalpheus shrimp than any other genera of shrimp! You know you have one in your mangrove root sample because you can hear each one snap in your tub. If you have large sponges that kind of have Swiss-cheese like holes, it’s very likely that you’ll find many Synalpheus shrimps finding shelter deep within them. A large orange clionid sponge encrusting on one of our roots had over 40 of them!

So much of the mangrove root has been taken over by a clionid sponge that you can barely tell that this came from a tree!

Apparently, there have been studies showing that Synalpheus shrimp can live in large colonies (up to 300 members!) and exhibit eusocial organization. All of the members are the offspring of a single large queen female and tend to /defend her as male soldiers. Only a single male (or a lucky few) are able to directly pass on their genes by mating with the queen. This unique social structure has been hypothesized to exist because members in the group are able to get more benefits (like division of labor) this way instead of each trying to reproduce themselves. These benefits are known as inclusive fitness benefits.

Some Synalpheus shrimp from a root – notice how semi-transparent and small they are!

Anyways, identifying any type of shrimp is no easy task. Even while using taxonomic key with a diagram of all the potential visible parts of a shrimp, getting down to the (correct) genus took close to an hour for each shrimp. The shrimps we were looking at were semi-transparent, which meant some of the small hairs and “teeth-like” structures on their heads were close to invisible. It definitely takes a trained eye to be able to quickly work through the step-by-step nature of taxonomic keys. Once Paulo gave us a satisfied thumbs-up at our educated guesses, the puzzling looks on our faces turned into relieved high-fives. Coll and I identified a Synalpheus dardeaui after looking at very specific parts of the legs, mouth parts, tail, and more of a shrimp no more than three centimeters.

Shrimp diagram + taxnomic keys = body parts that don’t even sound like real words.

Who knew one shrimp ID could cause so much frustration and satisfaction?

I definitely came to appreciate the hard work that it takes to describe species and relate them together enough to create step-by-step taxonomic guides. Taxonomy is no longer a “hot” field to pursue, so there a fewer specialists in sometimes cryptic and under-described groups who are taking on species identification challenges from all over the world. But the ability to describe and classify an organism in relation to others is still extremely important – phylogenies can’t die with the few specialists who currently study them!

Week 2: Longest week of my life

I think I just worked a 83-hour week.

Here’s what my schedule looked like:

6:45 a.m. Wake up

7:30 a.m. Get on a boat to one of our mangrove sites to clip pre-selected mangrove roots and take sediment cores

10:30 a.m. Get back to lab to begin processing the roots (finding organisms, scraping mollusks, etc etc)

Specimens are collected, seawater is sieved, and we are ready to identify and take pictures of organisms!

4:00 p.m. “Lunch” break

5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. Take apart the root, sort, identify, and take photos of interesting organisms

Check out this awesome polychaete worm (Family: Nereididae!)

11:00 p.m. Dinner

The more things that were growing on the mangrove root sample, particularly large hole-y sponges, the more organisms we would find. The microhabitats on mangrove roots are incredible – one day, I saw the small tentacles of an octopus larvae creep out of a mollusk. I grew so attached to it that I couldn’t watch it get preserved in formalin for DNA analysis.

Sorry, little guy. (PC: Rosalyn Lam)

Lifting trash cans full of water into the boat is maybe the hardest part of the day – and it’s how I start some of my mornings. Sometimes they can be up to 50 pounds, which may seem light, but is definitely a back-breaking challenge for me since I have very minimal upper body strength.

At the end of our morning trip out to a study site, our boat is filled with trash cans filled with seawater and mangrove roots. Sometimes, we also get pelted by cold rain and look kind of miserable. (PC: Matt Leray)

My favorite part of each day is dramatically breaking up the mangrove roots to search for organisms that burrow in the roots. We got $5 machetes to execute this task, which seems appropriate  for doing research in the tropics.

Don’t mess with Texas (in the tropics). Doesn’t the inside of the root kind of remind you of BBQ? (PC: Rosalyn Lam)

Although these next few weeks of collecting mangrove data are probably going to be the some of the most physically  intense weeks of my life, it’s nice to think that I’m getting physically and mentally stronger – marine biodiversity field studies are no joke!

Week 1: Re-introduction into Panama

Things that I have managed to accomplish this week:

  • Not come to Panama with everything that I need
  • Climb through six different mangrove forests
  • Feel sentimental, thankful, stressed, tired, etc etc

I arrived in Panama City, Panama last Sunday after a week of frantic goodbyes and packing two large suitcases full of field equipment and clothes. At once, everything was familiar – from arriving through the same terminal in PTY (the international airport) as I did about 8 months ago to driving on Tumba Muerto, a street I took the bus on every morning to go to Spanish class with my group of study abroad friends. My broken Spanish quickly came back to me in the car with Carlitos, who was pointing out where a new above-ground metrorail was going to be built. I stayed in Panama City for one night in a swanky Wyndham hotel room alone, not really knowing what to do with myself before my next flight to Bocas del Toro, a small archipelago on the Caribbean side of Panama.

A view of Panama City (and all the boats coming to/from the Panama Canal) from the plane.

The next day, after I spent a few hours at the Smithsonian library trying to be productive, I made my way to the domestic airport just to be met at the door with all the other students who I would be working with this summer. I immediately recognized Bryan, who I met this past January at a marine biology workshop in Corpus Christi and offered me a spot in this research project. Everyone else introduced themselves with friendly smiles and seemed just excited as I was to see where we would be doing field work together for the next month and a half. We had to abandon some equipment because it was “flammable,” (as flammable as paper, if we’re being honest) and set off on a quick hour-long flight to Bocas del Toro.

Plane shot of Bastimentos (another island in Bocas del Toro)!

We met up with Matt, who is the post-doc and lead scientist of the project, and made our way to the Smithsonian facility. It feels *so official* to be working at a real marine station, with real labs and real boats and real marine biologists who couldn’t care less about formalities. Also our research dorms are so nice!

Our (already messy) dorm room.

After settling in that night, we were immediately tasked to familiarize ourselves with the local mangrove ecosystems. For the rest of the week, we spent long days in the field climbing through the fringes of mangrove forests to find their biomass by measuring their diameter and height. The long and entangled roots of red mangroves made it incredibly tricky to maneuver through them, and we all got scraped up, bruised, and bitten by small swampy sand flies and mosquitoes. One site had some of the most polluted water in the entire area due to the waste water from the local community that gets dumped into the bay. Inside the mangroves, we found an old computer, washing machine, bike, and more. We tried to avoid spending too much time in the water, knowing that it was probably full of fecal matter from the local residents.

Mangroves host a huge amount of biodiversity on their roots! Here is a good example of the sponge diversity you can find on them.

Mangroves are also important as fish nurseries!

More mangrove roots!

Unfortunately, a lot of trash can get caught on the mangrove roots and stay there.

I also forgot an important piece of field equipment in Houston, which has led to a stressful past 48 hours. I think it is resolved now, but a huge shout out to the people at Rice (and NOT FedEx) for helping me out!

Today we have a rare day off and we plan on doing laundry, grocery shopping, and hitting up Playa Bluff. This week has definitely been a lot of getting used to life in the field, but I look forward to working more in these ecosystems!

Update: Playa Bluff pretty much looked like a desktop wallpaper.

**Also quickly. I would not be here if it wasn’t for a lot of people who helped me fall in love with Panama last fall when I studied abroad here. I was flooded with so many memories of my panas (friends) and I laughing, exploring, and learning together the second I landed. To my parents, advisors, and friends who have believed in me – I have so much to thank you for. Expect random teary-eyed Snapchats/texts over the course of this summer. So much love for you all!

Am I a Global Citizen?

“The capacity to get under the surface in order to understand these differences, to balance one against another, and try to resolve them is the hallmark of the global citizen.”

For me, the characteristics that help shape a global engagement with the world are curiosity, open-mindedness, and empathy. Simply knowing, tolerating, and accepting other perspectives allows for a mental distance between you and the place you’re traveling to, which gives a sort of relief and retreat back into your personal mental comfort zone. Attempting to create a world-view requires the intentional challenging of your own ideologies, refusing to accept anything at face value and critically examining the reason for why things are (and why you think things are the way they are).

After talking to people who have grown up in multiple parts of the world, I think that global citizenship exists. Some people cannot point to specific GPS locations for where they formed their identity and values. Instead, they point to the constant and iterative process of communicating ideas with a diverse global community of people. Especially now, we are invited to consider history and culture from a variety of viewpoints (hopefully), so I think all of us have in us a bit of global citizenship.

Would I consider myself a global citizen? Probably not. I think I still have a lot of ground to cover before I can call myself a person with strong global citizenship. I have for the most part spent the past 20 summers in Houston, Texas with my parents, which has created a large safety net for me. I am at minimum able to more clearly identify the reasons behind my personal values and beliefs. I don’t know if I aspire to have the title of a global citizen, either. I think that empathy can be developed anywhere, but perhaps travelling to a new country and culture more explicitly encourages such personal growth.

One of the most tangible ways I can be more globally engaged on this trip is to refuse to settle for only a scientific perspective on the natural wonders around me. Personally, science is one of my mental safety nets because it is supposed to be standardized and objective.

“Science often offers a powerful protection against fundamentalism and extremism. It is concerned with observable reality and, refreshingly, makes no claims for eternal truths.”

However, the social implications and human components of science can never be removed. How can we better address issues facing our natural environments if we do not to consider the human-nature interface? While not all biologists are necessarily doing conservation-based research, I think that they should all have a civic responsibility in making sure their projects actually benefit the places in which they execute their projects. Otherwise, their findings may only exist in an intellectual space that bolsters itself and nothing else. Leaving this critical engagement to someone else, unfortunately is no longer excusable now when humans continue to exploit natural resources and degrade whole ecosystems. The complexity and ambiguity of a scientific problem and its associated social implications are intertwined and part of what makes discovering something new rewarding and enlightening.

This view of scientific global engagement may be a product of my idealistic millennial mind who has yet to face the logistical constraints of tackling every aspect of marine biology and conservation all at once. However, I think it’s my responsibility to give it an honest try.

P.S. This post was written on my flight to Panama but I was supposed to have done it before this – hopefully international airspace is one of those tricky exceptions that will allow the CCL to forgive me.

News Review: From Panama’s Canal to Marine Ecosystems

Article 1: Panama Seeks Adventurers, Not Tourists in New Campaign from VML

The Panamanian government, specifically the Tourism Authority of Panama, has invested in a new tourism advertising campaign that sets apart its tropical wonders from those of other Latin American countries. Although bustling with new development, Panama is reframed in these advertisements to be for travelers…not for tourists. This may be due to the lack of easily accessible and ubiquitous luxury vacation experiences. The untouched beauty of natural ecosystems is closer to Panama’s unique identity – interestingly, it’s one that’s created by VML, a marketing and advertising agency based in the United States.

“The Central American country has few all-inclusive luxury resorts. The region doesn’t offer all-you-can-eat buffets. And Panama isn’t meant for those that need hand-holding. In short, there are tourists and there are trailblazers. And Panama is looking to attract the latter.”

It’s clear the Panamanian government is trying to attract a particular type of international visitor – one who is younger, low maintenance, and willing to explore uncharted territories that may be rough around the edges. It seems culturally precarious, though, to have outsiders try to represent authentic and unique Panamanian culture. In watching the flashy, well-edited, and fast-paced video linked in the article, I could barely recognize some of the sights that I saw while studying abroad there. I can see how these videos would attract people like me, who want to stray away from the stereotype of a typical shallow tourist seeking a tropical getaway . But calling outside visitors/tourists/travelers as the “trailblazers” of the country removes Panama of its own integrity, culture, and history.  In short, the videos are cinematic, but not particularly informative, potentially selling Panama in the wrong way.

Article link (with video): https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/301018/panama-seeks-adventurers-not-tourists-in-new-camp.html

Article 2: Spotlight: Social Effects of the Panama Canal

The Panama Canal is one of the Seven Wonders of the Modern World. It bridges two oceans and holds the global economy together, but also has a number of social implications that can be felt by all Panamanians. Only certain sectors of society are able to benefit from the canal, but because the canal has such a stronghold on the functioning of the country, there have been political and social movements addressing how Panama’s economy needs to diversify so that even those far removed from the canal can create a livelihood for themselves. The exclusionary practices of the canal can be attributed some to the massive amount of U.S influence in the country when Americans were in charge of it. With the recent expansion of the canal to accommodate even larger vessels, the question of how the money is distributed within Panama, and what that means for people who do not directly receive employment from the canal, will be crucial to address in the next coming years.

Milaflores Lock, one of three locks in the Panama Canal.

Although the Panama Canal is the most prominent way in which Panama is using its waterways for economic gains, it is by no means the only way in which the country uses water as a major source of wealth. In other parts of Panama, I have observed how damming rivers for electricity has threatened indigenous livelihoods and led endemic and undiscovered species to rapid extinction. Because of these large influxes of money circulating amongst only a certain group of individuals, Panama is an incredibly socially stratified country. But some of the happiest people I met were in more remote parts of the country, living and tending to small agricultural farms with their families nearby. It does not excuse, however, the social responsibility the government has to all of its people, regardless of their involvement with the Panama Canal.

Article link: http://news.wjct.org/post/spotlight-social-effects-panama-canal

Article 3: Young Mangrove Defenders Fight to Save Panama’s Wetlands

This short film by Christopher Springate highlights the problems of mangrove and wetland conservation in Panama’s Chiriquí Province. This area has seen massive amounts of deforestation due to the agricultural demands placed on the land. Over 50% of Panama’s mangroves have disappeared as a result, some of which is for the leather tanning industry that uses the Red Mangrove species to give their leather its characteristic red color. Although people are generally aware of the biodiversity mangroves support, there are still challenges to creating economic alternatives for locals who might need to clear mangrove forests for cattle ranching and farming. However, international initiatives for conservation are supporting local schoolchildren by teaching them the importance of mangroves and helping them grow mangroves to be replanted in nearby deforested areas. One small girl explained that it would help bring the animals back and help her father bring more fish to the table. In addition, scientists are taking samples of mangroves to try and understand the amount of carbon dioxide mangroves intake – some estimates are that mangroves can take up to five times more carbon dioxide than normal trees.

Me gracefully getting onto our boat after a long day of mangroves data collection. A preview to what I will look like this summer! Photo by: Cayla Carson

This article helps give some societal context to the research I will be doing in Bocas del Toro, which is located in the province right next to the Chiriquí Province. In a lot of ways, the agricultural runoff has affected the marine biology of the rest of the Chiriquí Lagoon, which I will be sampling some from. Wetlands conservation is incredibly important, and part of my research helps inform that by examining the amount of fish biodiversity that can be found in mangroves, specifically Red Mangroves since they are the ones at the outermost fringe between land and water. I hope that I can meet with some people from these conservation efforts while I am in the area to get a more nuanced perspective on the difficulties of protecting and replenishing wetlands. Chiriquí to me represents the breadbasket of Panama, so there are definitely implications to reducing agricultural activity in this region for reforestation. However, slowly transitioning to more sustainable methods like agroforestry and organic farming may help.

Article link (with 7-minute video): http://www.dw.com/en/global-ideas-panama-mangroves-children/a-37742746

Article 4: Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples

This paper by Thomsen et al. in 2012 describes the potential of using environmental DNA (eDNA) to study fish diversity in marine habitats. It overall summarizes how traditional methods of fish surveying, which largely include a specialized diver doing fish counts in the water, can lead to human errors like misidentification and overall underestimation of fish diversity. This was the first paper to use environmental DNA directly from the seawater to study marine fish biodiversity. They used next-generation sequencing of PCR amplicons and obtained DNA samples from 15 different fish species as a result. These included economically important fish species as well as rare species that have not been reported from conventional monitoring. Overall, they concluded that even small samples of seawater can contain a wide range of fish species in local areas. Additionally, they found that eDNA fragments degrade within days.

An artistic rendition of eDNA sampling of marine environments by Kelly Lance.

This paper was one of the first I turned to when I was setting up my Wagoner project and attempting to understand the methodology behind eDNA sampling and analysis. I think it is really fascinating that marine sampling for fish diversity in this way has only been around for the past five years, but holds great potential for monitoring efforts in the future. I know from firsthand experience that trying to count fish and identify them to the species level on the spot without error is incredibly challenging, especially if you are not scuba diving. Additionally, I oftentimes scared fish away by swimming near them, which made my data more erroneous. Since eDNA only stays detectable in marine environments for a few days, I can capture a larger moment in time than when I was counting fish for one or two hours in the water. Additionally, I am able to (with some reliability) say that the fish species I have found in my samples were in that area fairly recently. I hope that I can add to this body of research for highly productive shallow water Caribbean ecosystems.

Citation: Thomsen, Philip Francis, et al. “Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples.” PLoS one 7.8 (2012): e41732.

Interview: A Third Culture Kid’s Perspective

Rodrigo Trujillo (McMutry, ’20) was born a global citizen and is likely to remain one his entire life. Although his mother is Argentinian and father is Salvadorian, Rodrigo’s lineage traces back to Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United States.

Rodrigo identifies himself as a third culture kid – he’s lived and studied in five different countries all over Latin America but was educated under an American school system and has maintained an international network of friends, family, and employers. Before his freshman year at Rice, he attended Balboa Academy, a high school located in Panama City, Panama.

“There’s something magical about living in a place where you are surrounded by a tropical rainforest on one side and an ocean with amazing beaches on the other. It makes the city feel as if it’s connected to the earth.”

Needless to say, Rodrigo misses all aspects of Panama, especially since he likes outdoor activities including hiking, surfing, and playing soccer.

In transitioning to American life, he had the biggest culture shock when he discovered the close-mindedness of some Americans. After having a global perspective his entire life, Rodrigo was surprised to meet individuals who had a skewed or erroneous view of the world and the problems it faced.

“It seemed almost as if the U.S. is a bubble that isolates people from real problems plaguing the rest of the planet…I have learned to be more tolerant and to recognize that other people had different upbringings than I did.”

Rodrigo also noted adjustments to other parts of American life, including feeling safe enough to bike alone in large American cities and interacting with people of different socioeconomic backgrounds. While some Latin American cities are largely developed, it was not safe enough for him to leave home alone sometimes. Also, attending only international private schools limited the amount of time he spent in conversation with people of different economic statuses. However, after taking a sociology class at Rice, Rodrigo now has a better grasp on how history can have a profound impact on current social problems and larger issues.

Unsurprisingly, Rodrigo advised me to keep an open mind when considering all Panama has to offer. A little courage and spontaneity are the keys to seeing how interesting and exciting Panama can be – bustling metropolises, smaller shanty towns, and pristine rainforests are all within an hour’s drive. While I have gotten a mere glimpse of the amazing range of experiences Panama has after my study abroad program there last fall, I look forward to returning and exploring new sights and sounds! Thanks Rodrigo for the insightful chat!